From “Holding Fast” to “the ʿItrah Being the Rope of God”: An Analysis of the Fifth Aspect of the Evidentiary Significance of Hadith al-Thaqalayn in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār and a Critique of ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī’s Claim
Author: Hamed Sarem
An Analysis of the Fifth Argument Concerning the Import of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār and a Critique of ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī’s Claim
The fifth article in the series rereading the sixty-six arguments in the response of Mīr Sayyid Ḥāmid Ḥusayn Hindī
Can deliverance from misguidance be tied to “holding fast” to the Prophet’s progeny while no role in guidance or religious authority is accorded to them? By claiming that “being that to which one must hold fast” does not necessarily entail “supreme leadership,” ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī seeks to neutralize the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things as evidence for the Shiʿi position. In the fifth argument of ʿAbaqāt, Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn targets precisely this point: he first demonstrates that, in the usage of Sunni exegetes and lexicographers, iʿtiṣām means holding fast, clinging firmly, and grasping a means of deliverance; he then takes a further step and, on the basis of a body of exegetical reports, establishes the relationship between the Prophet’s progeny and the “rope of God.” From “We are the rope of God” and “For they are two ropes that do not break” to the verses attributed to al-Shāfiʿī concerning the “ark of salvation” and the “saved sect,” the issue is no longer merely a lexical discussion; it concerns the place of the Prophet’s progeny in the means by which the community is guided after the Prophet (may God bless him and his family).
Abstract
In Tuḥfa-yi Ithnā ʿAshariyya, after quoting the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things, ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī denies its relevance to the Imami position and bases his argument on the proposition that “that to which one must hold fast need not possess supreme leadership.” In ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, Sayyid Ḥāmid Ḥusayn Mūsawī Nīshābūrī Hindī sets out sixty-six independent arguments to challenge this claim. The present study is the fifth article in a series examining these arguments and addresses the “fifth argument,” in which the author of ʿAbaqāt draws on a version of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things containing the expression “if you hold fast to it” (إن اعتصمتم به) to establish the obligation to follow the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them). The article is organized into two parts. The first examines the meaning of iʿtiṣām in Sunni commentaries and lexical sources, demonstrating that the term is repeatedly explained as “clinging firmly,” “holding fast,” adhering to religion and obedience, and taking refuge in something that protects against falling and going astray. Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s discussion is particularly important here: in addition to defining iʿtiṣām as “holding fast to something,” he explains the metaphor of the “rope” on the basis of the saving role of holding fast. The second part moves beyond the lexical discussion: a number of Sunni scholars identify the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them), ʿAlī (peace be upon him), or the Prophet’s progeny as referents of the “rope of God” in the verse “And hold fast, all together, to the rope of God.” In some reports, this interpretation is linked directly to the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things, to the extent that the Book of God and the Prophet’s progeny are described as “two ropes,” to both of which the community is commanded to hold fast. The verses attributed to Imam al-Shāfiʿī concerning the “rope of God,” the “ark of salvation,” and the “saved sect,” together with Aḥmad ʿUjaylī’s explicit statement of “the obligation to hold fast to their words, deeds, and states,” constitute two prominent pieces of evidence in this part. The conclusion is that the fifth argument, taken on its own, renders the conception of the Prophet’s progeny as merely objects of love and respect incompatible with a network of lexical, exegetical, and hadith evidence, and challenges the claim that the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things has absolutely no connection with the religious authority of the Ahl al-Bayt.
Comments
No comments yet.
Keywords: Hadith of the Two Weighty Things; ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār; Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn Hindī; ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī; iʿtiṣām (holding fast); tamassuk (adherence); rope of God; the Prophet’s progeny; obligation to follow; Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).
Introduction: From Denying Any “Bearing” to Sixty-Six Responses
The discussion of the import of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things (Hadith al-Thaqalayn) in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār is not merely a dispute over the soundness of its chain of transmission or the multiplicity of its transmission routes. An important part of the disagreement concerns the nature of the relationship that the hadith establishes between the Muslim community and the Prophet’s progeny: is the progeny in this hadith merely the object of reverence and love, or is it an authority to which guidance after the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is linked through recourse and adherence? Volume twenty of the edition used in this study is expressly devoted to “the import of Hadith al-Thaqalayn,” and the author himself identifies the purpose of this section as refuting the statement of the author of Tuḥfa denying that the hadith indicates the Imamate (ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, pp. 11–12).
1. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī’s Position: The Hadith “Has No Bearing” on the Shiʿi Claim
“This hadith, too, like the preceding hadiths, has no bearing on the claim; for it is not necessary that the one adhered to should possess supreme leadership.”
ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlawī, as quoted in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 37
Dihlawī’s argument is brief but decisive. Here, he does not deny the expression “adherence” itself; rather, he denies the necessary connection between “being the one adhered to” and “possessing supreme leadership.” From this perspective, a person or a thing may be the object of adherence without general leadership and the Imamate thereby being established for that person or thing. A precise response to Dihlawī must therefore show that “the one adhered to” in Hadith al-Thaqalayn is not a neutral object of adherence, but is accompanied within the hadith itself by attributes that determine the nature of the community’s relationship with the progeny. This point is the common thread running through the numerous lines of argument that Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn presents after quoting Dihlawī’s statement.
2. The Overall Response of ʿAbaqāt and the Place of the Present Article
Immediately after quoting Dehlawī’s statement, Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn opens a section entitled “The Author’s Sixty-Six Arguments in Refutation of the Author of Tuḥfa,” and, from the first argument onward, each time highlights part of the hadith’s network of implications (ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 37). The present article is the fifth installment in a series that independently reexamines and analyzes each of these arguments. The four preceding articles in this series are:
1. From Holding Fast to Authoritative Reference: A Research Synopsis of the First of the Sixty-Six Arguments for the Implications of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, in Critique of ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dehlawī
2. From Holding Fast to the Obligation of Obedience: A Research Synopsis of the Second of the Sixty-Six Arguments for the Implications of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, in Critique of ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dehlawī
3. From Holding Fast to Protection from Misguidance after the Prophet: A Reexamination of the Third Argument for the Implications of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār
4. From the “Two Weighty Things” to the Obligation to Take from the Prophet’s Progeny and Act upon Their Teachings: An Analysis of the Fourth Argument for the Implications of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār and a Critique of ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dehlawī’s Claim
The fifth line of argument is, in one respect, connected to the preceding four and, in another, independent of them. Its connection lies in the fact that the discussion still concerns the nature of the authority of the ʿitrah and whether the wording of the hadith signifies following them in practice; its independence lies in the fact that the pivotal term this time is “iʿtiṣām” (holding fast), and that, in the second half of the argument, the verse “And hold fast, all together, to the rope of Allah” and the interpretation of “the rope of Allah” as the ʿitrah enter the discussion. Accordingly, the present article has deliberately been organized into two independent parts: the first, “The Meaning of Iʿtiṣām,” and the second, “The ʿItrah as the Rope of Allah.”
3. Research Method and Scope
The research method is descriptive, analytical, and text-centered. The primary text of the fifth line of argument appears on pages 53–65 of the digital version used, corresponding approximately to pages 42–53 of the printed text. In reconstructing Sunni views, the guiding principle is to report accurately what Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn quotes in ʿAbaqāt. Where biographical or bibliographical information has been added, contemporary reference works have been used, and this information has been distinguished from the text of ʿAbaqāt. Furthermore, the large number of named transmitters has not automatically been taken to signify a large number of independent chains of transmission, since many later authors have retransmitted an earlier report—particularly that of al-Thaʿlabī. An independent examination of the transmitters and manuscript evidence for all the chains of transmission in the fifth line of argument would constitute a separate study, and this article makes no claim to have undertaken it.
Part One: “Iʿtiṣām” in the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things: From Holding Fast to the Obligation to Follow
4. The Exact Wording of the Author of ʿAbaqāt, without the Detailed Quotations from Sunni Sources
To prevent the framework of Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn’s argument from being obscured by the numerous quotations from exegetes and lexicographers, we first bring together his own words, omitting the detailed supporting material cited from others while preserving the sequence of the argument. Omissions are indicated by […]:
“The fifth point is that His Eminence the Messenger—may Allah bless him and his family and grant them peace—... also made the obligation to follow the Ahl al-Bayt—peace be upon them—clear and manifest in this noble hadith through his statement: ‘I have left among you that by which you will never go astray after me if you hold fast to it: the Book of Allah and my progeny.’ [...] It is perfectly evident that the term iʿtiṣām [holding fast] is synonymous with the term tamassuk [clinging firmly]; thus, beyond doubt, in this noble hadith, like the term tamassuk, it conveys the meaning of following and taking as an example. As for the synonymy of iʿtiṣām and tamassuk, although it admits of no doubt, some evidence for it from the statements of Qur’anic commentators, lexicographers, and other Sunni scholars should nevertheless be heard, so as to establish the proof in full.”
ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, pp. 53–54.
“Let it not remain unnoticed that, just as the obligation to hold fast to the Ahl al-Bayt—peace be upon them—is clear and manifest from the words of the Master of Humankind ... concerning the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things, so too is the necessity of holding fast to these revered personages established and confirmed by the words of God, the Bestower of Blessings, in the Glorious Qur’an and the Praiseworthy Criterion; for in the verse abounding in guidance, ‘And hold fast, all together, to the rope of Allah’ ... what is meant by the rope of Allah is the sacred persons of the Ahl al-Bayt of His Eminence the Messenger ... .”
ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 60.
“Among the proofs of the ascendancy of truth is that some Sunni Qur’anic commentators, in interpreting the verse ‘And hold fast, all together, to the rope of Allah,’ have cited the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things as evidence that the progeny of His Eminence the Messenger—may Allah bless him and his family and grant them peace—are the rope of Allah, and have quoted this noble hadith in a wording that explicitly indicates that these revered personages—peace be upon them—are the rope.”
ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 64.
“Since there could be no doubt or uncertainty that the import of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things (al-Thaqalayn) accords with the guidance-laden meaning of the verse ‘واعتصموا بحبل الله’ (‘And hold fast to the rope of Allah’), the leading Sunni scholars necessarily cite both together when establishing the obligation to hold fast to the Ahl al-Bayt, peace be upon them.”
ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 65.
5. Translation and Restatement of the Passage from ʿAbaqāt in Fluent Persian
The author of ʿAbaqāt means that, in one transmission of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things, the Noble Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him and his family) made the community’s protection from misguidance contingent upon “holding fast” (iʿtiṣām) to the Book of God and the ʿitrah, his family. The ʿitrah, therefore, is not merely an object of love or veneration; it is that “to which the community must hold fast.” In Arabic, iʿtiṣām means clinging to something, grasping it firmly, taking refuge in it, and binding oneself to it to prevent a fall. For this reason, Mir Hamid Husayn regards it in this context as synonymous with, or at least belonging to the same semantic field as, “holding fast” (tamassuk), and concludes that holding fast to the ʿitrah in matters of religious guidance cannot be fully realized without following them and taking them as exemplars.
To ensure that this analysis is not regarded as merely a personal assertion, he pursues two lines of supporting evidence. The first consists of gathering evidence from Sunni exegetes and lexicographers to show that “iʿtiṣām,” in Quranic and lexical usage, has been explained as “istimsāk” and “tamassuk”—holding fast. The second moves from the lexical meaning to the exegetical identification of what constitutes “the rope of Allah”: if the Ahl al-Bayt or the ʿitrah have been identified as a referent of the rope in the verse ‘واعتصموا بحبل الله’ (‘And hold fast to the rope of Allah’), then the connection “holding fast–rope–ʿitrah” can be observed within an exegetical network.
6. The Narration Cited in the Fifth Argument
“I have left among you that by which you will never go astray after me if you hold fast to it: the Book of God and my progeny.”
The wording cited in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, vol. 20, digital edition, p. 53.
Translation: “I have left among you something by which, if you hold fast to it after me, you will not go astray: the Book of God and my progeny.” Citing Muḥammad Badakhshānī in Miftāḥ al-Najāt, Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn attributes this wording to Ibn Abī Shaybah in al-Muṣannaf and al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī in al-Muttafiq wa-l-Muftariq (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, p. 54). At this stage, the present article reconstructs the account given in ʿAbaqāt, leaving an independent assessment of the manuscript versions and chains of transmission of all the transmission routes to a separate hadith study.
The important point for interpreting the narration’s structure is the relationship between condition and consequence: “not going astray” is made contingent upon “holding fast.” Thus, holding fast in this context is neither an ineffectual nor a ceremonial act; according to the text of the narration, it is an act that serves a guiding function and prevents going astray. It is this very connection that makes the lexical definition of ʿiṣmah as prevention, and that of iʿtiṣām as holding fast in order to avoid falling into harm, important to the argument of the author of ʿAbaqāt.
7. Evidence from Sunni Qurʾanic Exegesis for the Meaning of “Holding Fast”
On pages 54–59 of the digital edition, Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn brings together a large collection of Qurʾanic commentaries. The principal names in this group are Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, al-Thaʿlabī, al-Wāḥidī, al-Baghawī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Bayḍāwī, Niẓām al-Dīn al-Naysābūrī, author of Gharāʾib al-Qurʾān, ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Khāzin, Abū Ḥayyān al-Andalusī, Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, Muḥammad al-Shirbīnī al-Khaṭīb, and Ṣiddīq Ḥasan Khān. Since many of these passages repeat the same substance in similar wording, their common meaning, rather than repeated quotations, may be stated as follows: “iʿtiṣām” means adhering, holding fast, clinging firmly, taking refuge, and adhering to God’s religion and obedience to Him; this holding fast is presented as a cause of guidance and protection from slipping into error (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, pp. 54–59).
In al-Ṭabarī’s account, “وَمَنْ يَعْتَصِمْ بِاللَّهِ” (“Whoever holds fast to God”) is explained as attaching oneself to the means provided by God and adhering to religion and obedience; his interpretation of “وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِحَبْلِ اللَّهِ” (“And hold fast to the rope of God”) likewise speaks of adhering to God’s religion and covenant. Al-Thaʿlabī, al-Wāḥidī, and al-Baghawī repeat this same understanding. Al-Bayḍāwī, al-Khāzin, and al-Shirbīnī also speak of adhering to religion, the Book, and obedience. Abū Ḥayyān uses the expression “استمسكوا وتحصنوا” (“hold fast and take refuge within a fortress”); that is, he understands iʿtiṣām as both holding fast and placing oneself within a fortress. Ṣiddīq Ḥasan Khān likewise explains iʿtiṣām as “يستمسك بدينه وطاعته” (“he holds fast to His religion and obedience to Him”) and identifies the root meaning of ʿiṣmah as keeping oneself from falling into harm.
8. Fakhr al-Rāzī: The Central Semantic Witness
8–1. Brief Introduction and Scholarly Standing
Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar al-Rāzī (543/544–606 AH; 1149–1210 CE), the renowned Ashʿarī theologian, Qurʾanic exegete, and scholar of legal theory, is among the most important figures in Sunni theology and Qurʾanic exegesis of the medieval period. Mafātīḥ al-ghayb, or al-Tafsīr al-kabīr, is his best-known exegetical work, while al-Maḥṣūl, al-Arbaʿīn fī uṣūl al-dīn, and al-Maʿālim are counted among his other important works. The Turkish Encyclopaedia of Islam explicitly identifies him as an Ashʿarī scholar active in theology, philosophy, Qurʾanic exegesis, and legal theory, and records his death in Herat in 606 AH/1210 CE. In the present discussion, al-Rāzī’s importance lies not in agreement with the Imāmī theological conclusion, but in the scholarly weight of his lexical-exegetical definition: that is, testimony from a theologian who thinks within an Ashʿarī and Sunni framework (TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, entry “Fahreddin er-Râzî”; see also the entry “Mefâtîhu’l-Gayb”).
8–2. An Explicit Definition of Iʿtiṣām
“وَالِاعْتِصَامُ فِي اللُّغَةِ الِاسْتِمْسَاكُ بِالشَّيْءِ، وَأَصْلُهُ مِنَ الْعِصْمَةِ، وَالْعِصْمَةُ: الْمَنْعُ فِي كَلَامِ الْعَرَبِ ... وَاعْتَصَمَ فُلَانٌ بِالشَّيْءِ: تَمَسَّكَ بِهِ فَيَمْنَعُ نَفْسَهُ مِنَ الْوُقُوعِ فِي آفَةٍ.” (“Iʿtiṣām, in the language, means holding fast to something. It derives from ʿiṣmah, and ʿiṣmah means prevention in the speech of the Arabs … ‘So-and-so sought iʿtiṣām in something’ means that he held fast to it, thereby preventing himself from falling into harm.”)
Fakhr al-Rāzī’s statement as quoted in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, digital edition, p. 55.
Translation: “Iʿtiṣām, in its lexical sense, means holding firmly and clinging to something. It derives from ʿiṣma, and ʿiṣma in the Arabic language means prevention ... It is said that someone sought iʿtiṣām through something, meaning that he held fast to it and thereby prevented himself from falling into harm.” This passage has three direct implications for the argument of the author of ʿAbaqāt: first, al-Rāzī explicitly calls iʿtiṣām “istimsāk” (holding fast); second, in explaining the same word, he uses “tamassuk” (adherence); third, he identifies the function of this adherence as protection against “falling into harm.” The third link bears an evident correspondence to “you will never go astray” in the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things: in both contexts, iʿtiṣām serves a preventive function against falling and going astray.
8–3. The Rope Analogy and Deliverance from Slipping
In his commentary on “And hold fast to the rope of Allah,” al-Rāzī also offers another explanation, which Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn quotes at length. He gives the example of a person traversing a narrow path who fears slipping: if he clings to a rope firmly secured at both ends, he is saved from falling. He then concludes that the “rope” is anything that leads a person to the truth along the path of religion. In this same context, he cites interpretations such as covenant, the Qur’an, religion, obedience, and the community, and regards them as closely related in their protection against falling (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, pp. 56–57).
This analogy takes the fifth line of argument beyond a purely lexical discussion. The “rope” is something to which one must hold fast in order to be saved from falling. When, in the second part, the ʿitra (the Prophet’s family) is identified as an instance of the rope, al-Rāzī’s same figurative structure becomes applicable: within the argumentative logic of ʿAbaqāt, the ʿitra is among the instances of that “rope” to which holding fast is linked to guidance and deliverance from going astray.
After the Qurʾanic commentators, the author of ʿAbaqāt cites lexicographers. The principal names in this group are al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī in al-Mufradāt, Majd al-Dīn Ibn al-Athīr in al-Nihāya, Ibn Manẓūr in Lisān al-ʿArab, Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, Muḥammad Ṭāhir al-Fattanī in Majmaʿ al-Biḥār, and Murtaḍā al-Zabīdī in Tāj al-ʿArūs. The common ground among these sources can be condensed into two formulations: “العِصم: الإمساك، والاعتصام: الاستمساك” (“ʿIṣm means holding, and iʿtiṣām means holding fast”) and “الاعتصام: الامتساك بالشیء” (“Iʿtiṣām means holding fast to something”). Moreover, in explanations of the verses concerning iʿtiṣām, the word tamassuk—holding fast—to the rope, covenant, or religion recurs (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, pp. 59–60).
9–1. Ibn Manẓūr: A Representative of the Lexicographical Sources
Muḥammad ibn Mukarram Ibn Manẓūr (630–711 AH; 1232–1311 CE), a man of letters, lexicographer, and Shāfiʿī jurist, is best known for Lisān al-ʿArab, which the Turkish Encyclopaedia of Islam describes as one of the largest comprehensive dictionaries of the Arabic language. In compiling this dictionary, Ibn Manẓūr drew on works such as Tahdhīb al-Lugha, al-Muḥkam, al-Ṣiḥāḥ, and al-Nihāya. The significance of his testimony for this study is specifically lexical, rather than a matter of theological controversy: when a comprehensive dictionary such as Lisān al-ʿArab explains iʿtiṣām as “holding fast to something” and explicates the verses concerning iʿtiṣām through “holding fast” (tamassuk), the semantic premise advanced by the author of ʿAbaqāt gains support from specialized linguistic testimony (TDV, entries “İbn Manzûr” and “Lisânü’l-Arab”).
For this group, the article refrains from attributing “opposition to the Shia” to any lexicographer or Qurʾanic commentator unless clear evidence exists. What the argument of the fifth line of reasoning requires from Ibn Manẓūr and others like him is the lexical meaning of the word, rather than their sectarian positions.
10. Conclusions of Part One
The precise conclusion is that the formulation “إن اعتصمتم به” (“if you hold fast to it”) does not permit the community’s relationship with the Prophet’s progeny (ʿitra) to be reduced to mere respect and affection. In the usages collected in ʿAbaqāt, iʿtiṣām means grasping, committing oneself, seeking refuge, and using something as a means of protection against falling; in the hadith under discussion, the outcome of this iʿtiṣām is “not going astray.” Thus, in this formulation, the Prophet’s progeny stands within the very process of guidance. This conclusion directly answers the unqualified nature of Dihlawī’s statement, which separated “being that to which one holds fast” from leadership and religious authority; for the subject of the dispute is not some hypothetical object of adherence, but the Prophet’s progeny, adherence to whom, alongside the Qurʾan, is presented as preventing misguidance.
Part Two: “The ʿItra as the Rope of God”: From the Verse of Holding Fast to the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things
11. Why Is Part Two a Distinct and Important Area of Research?
From this point onward, Mir Hamid Husayn’s argument takes on a new character. In the first part, the question was, “What does holding fast mean?” In the second part, the question is, “In some exegetical works, to whom or to what has the rope to which one must hold fast been applied?” If the ʿitra or the Ahl al-Bayt are identified in the cited sources as referents of “the Rope of God,” then the connection between the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things and the verse of holding fast will not merely be the product of a verbal association; it will also find support in the exegetical tradition. Three points in this part are particularly important: the expression “فإنهما حبلان لا ینقطعان” (“for they are two ropes that do not break”) concerning the Book and the ʿitra; the poem attributed to al-Shafiʿi that brings together “the Rope of God,” “the Ark of Salvation,” and “the saved sect”; and al-ʿUjayli’s concluding statement, which extends holding fast to the sayings, actions, and states of the Ahl al-Bayt.
12. “We Are the Rope of God”: One Theme and a Group of Transmitters
The author of ʿAbaqat first quotes a report from al-Thaʿlabi’s commentary in which Imam Jaʿfar al-Sadiq (peace be upon him), interpreting the verse “واعتصموا بحبل الله جمیعاً ولا تفرقوا” (“Hold fast, all together, to the Rope of God, and do not become divided”), states: “نحن حبل الله الذی قال الله...” (“We are the Rope of God of which God said…”); that is, “We are that Rope of God to which God has commanded people to hold fast.” According to ʿAbaqat, Abu Nuʿaym al-Isfahani also included this same theme in his book concerning the verses revealed about ʿAli (peace be upon him). ʿIzz al-Din al-Rasʿani al-Hanbali likewise—as reported from Kashf al-Ghumma in ʿAbaqat—applied “the Rope of God” to ʿAli (peace be upon him) and the Ahl al-Bayt (ʿAbaqat, digital edition, p. 60).
“We are the Rope of God of which God said: ‘Hold fast, all together, to the Rope of God, and do not become divided.’” (نَحْنُ حَبْلُ اللهِ الَّذِي قَالَ اللهُ: «وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِحَبْلِ اللهِ جَمِيعًا وَلَا تَفَرَّقُوا».)
The substance of al-Thaʿlabī’s report from Imam al-Ṣādiq (peace be upon him), as cited in ʿAbaqāt, p. 60.
This same report has been reproduced in numerous later works. Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn names Nūr al-Dīn al-Samhūdī in Jawāhir al-ʿIqdayn, Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī in al-Ṣawāʿiq al-Muḥriqa, Maḥmūd al-Shaykhānī al-Qādirī in al-Ṣirāṭ al-Sawī, Muḥammad al-Badakhshānī in Miftāḥ al-Najāh, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī al-Ṣabbān in Isʿāf al-Rāghibīn, Muḥammad Mubīn al-Lakhnawī in Wasīlat al-Najāh, Walī Allāh al-Lakhnawī in Mirʾāt al-Muʾminīn, and Sulaymān al-Qundūzī in Yanābīʿ al-Mawadda (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, pp. 61–63).
Methodologically, this list should not be treated as providing multiple independent chains of transmission for a single report; many of these authors explicitly identify al-Thaʿlabī as their source. The significance of this multiplicity lies in its “exegetical circulation”: the formulation “the Ahl al-Bayt = the rope of God” passed from an early Qurʾanic commentary into a body of later works on hadith and virtues, and remained within the written tradition.
13. Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī: Reporting “the Rope of God” in a Work with an Explicitly Anti-Shiʿi Orientation
13–1. Introduction and Works
Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī (909–974 AH; 1503/1504–1567 CE), a Shāfiʿī jurist, hadith scholar, and man of letters, was a prominent figure in Shāfiʿī jurisprudence in the Hejaz. His well-known works include Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj, al-Zawājir ʿan Iqtirāf al-Kabāʾir, and al-Ṣawāʿiq al-Muḥriqa. The Turkish Encyclopaedia of Islam describes al-Ṣawāʿiq al-Muḥriqa as a work concerning the caliphate of the Rightly Guided Caliphs and the virtues of the Companions, and explicitly states that the book was written in the context of polemics with the Shiʿa and in response to their imamate-centered views; indeed, the wording “al-radd ʿalā ahl al-bidaʿ” (“refutation of the people of innovation”) or “ahl al-rafḍ” (“the rejectionists”) appears in the titles of some printed editions of the book (TDV, entries “İbn Hacer el-Heytemî” and “es-Savâiku’l-Muhrika”).
13–2. The Importance of Transmission in the Polemical Logic of *Abaqat*
Mir Hamid Husayn quotes from this very work, *al-Sawaʿiq al-Muḥriqa*, that Ibn Ḥajar, in the chapter on the verses concerning the virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt, cited Thaʿlabī’s narration concerning the verse “And hold fast, all together, to the rope of Allah,” quoting Imam al-Ṣādiq (peace be upon him): “We are the rope of Allah...” (*Abaqat*, digital edition, p. 61). This report, in itself, does not establish the authenticity of Thaʿlabī’s chain of transmission, nor does it naturally mean that Ibn Ḥajar accepted the Imami theory of the Imamate. Its precise value in the polemics of *Abaqat* is that the application of “the rope of Allah” to the Ahl al-Bayt is recorded even in a book whose author explicitly wrote against the Shiʿa on the question of the caliphate and Imamate. From a polemical standpoint, such evidence carried greater weight for Mir Hamid Husayn than a citation from an author sympathetic to the Imamis.
14. Qundūzī and the Narration “ʿAlī Is the Firm Rope of Allah”
Sulaymān ibn Ibrāhīm Qundūzī al-Ḥanafī, who died in 1294 AH/1877 CE, is the author of *Yanābīʿ al-Mawadda li-Dhawī al-Qurbā*, a manāqib work that collected numerous narrations concerning the Ahl al-Bayt (Usul.ai, entry “Yanābīʿ al-mawadda li-dhawī al-qurbā”). In addition to retransmitting “We are the rope of Allah,” Mir Hamid Husayn cites from him a report in which a Bedouin asks the Prophet (peace be upon him) about the rope of Allah, and the Prophet takes ʿAlī’s (peace be upon him) hand and says:
Citation from *Yanābīʿ al-Mawadda* in *Abaqat al-Anwar*, digital edition, p. 63
Translation: “Hold fast to this person; he is the firm rope of God.” In terms of the structure of the fifth line of argument, this report is particularly significant, for it links “rope” and “holding fast” to a specific person in a single sentence. Mir Hamid Husayn uses evidence of this kind to demonstrate that the connection between “seeking protection by holding fast—rope—holding fast—the Ahl al-Bayt” is not merely the product of wordplay, but has also been articulated in exegetical reports and accounts of virtues.
15. Imam al-Shafi‘i, the “Rope of God,” and the Saved Sect
15–1. Introduction and a Note on Attribution
Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi‘i (150–204 AH; 767–820 CE), the imam of the Shafi‘i school, is among the most influential jurists in Sunni history. Al-Risala and the collection al-Umm are among his principal works. Biographical sources present him as the founder of an independent legal tradition and a central figure in the formulation of legal-theoretical and hadith-based argumentation (TDV, entries “Şâfiî” and “el-Üm”). The sources also transmit accounts of his disputes with various groups, including the “Rafida”; it would therefore be incorrect to identify him with the Imamiyya. At the same time, numerous poems expressing love for the family of Muhammad have become well known within the literary corpus attributed to him. Their significance for reconstructing the fifth line of argument lies in the way Mir Hamid Husayn uses this report.
15–2. The Central Text and Its Translation
In the name of God, I embarked upon the ships of salvation; they are the household of the Chosen One, the Seal of the Messengers. And I grasped the rope of God, which is allegiance to them, just as we have been commanded to hold fast to the rope.
Verses attributed to al-Shāfiʿī, Dhakhīrat al-Maʾāl, as quoted in ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, p. 64.
Translation: “In the name of God, I boarded the ships of salvation; they are the Household of al-Muṣṭafā, the Seal of the Prophets. I grasped the rope of God, and that rope is their walāya, just as we have been commanded to hold fast to the rope.” The poem then addresses the hadith concerning the division of the community into “seventy-odd sects” and poses an argumentative question: if only one sect is saved, on which side should the Family of Muḥammad be placed—among those who perish or among those who are saved? It goes on to express acceptance of the imamate of ʿAlī and his descendants (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, p. 64).
15–3. Why Is This Passage Important for the Fifth Argument?
Within a single context, this passage connects several concepts: the “Ark of Salvation,” the “rope of God,” “holding fast,” the “division of the community,” the “saved sect,” and the “Family of Muḥammad.” For this reason, its value in this article goes beyond serving as evidence of love for the Ahl al-Bayt. In the logic of the transmitted text, the walāya of the Ahl al-Bayt is the “rope of God,” and the corresponding action is “grasping/holding fast”; this same holding fast is then situated within the framework of the salvation and perdition of the sects. After quoting the verses, Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn likewise emphasizes this connection and concludes that, in this poem, the Ahl al-Bayt are placed on the side of the Ark of Salvation and the saved sect.
16. “For They Are Two Ropes That Do Not Break”: The Direct Connection between the Rope of God and the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things
One of the most important passages in the fifth argument is where the author of ʿAbaqāt explicitly states that some Sunni exegetes have grounded the identification of the ʿitra—the Prophet’s family—as the “rope of God” in the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things itself. This point must be distinguished from the general reports stating, “We are the rope of God”; here, the relationship between the ʿitra and the rope has not been imposed upon the hadith from outside, but is explicitly stated in the very report cited as evidence.
Mir Hamid Husayn reports the following from Sayyid Muhammad Taliqani—whom he identifies as the successor of Sayyid Ali Hamadani—in the treatise Qiyafa-nama, as quoted by Majd al-Din Badakhshani in Jamiʿ al-Salasil:
“I am leaving among you the two weighty things: the Word of God and my progeny. Take heed, then, and hold fast to both of them, for they are two ropes that will not break until the Day of Resurrection.”
The report from Qiyafa-nama, transmitted through Jamiʿ al-Salasil, in ʿAbaqat al-Anwar, digital edition, p. 64.
Translation: “I am leaving among you the two weighty things: the Word of God and my progeny. Take heed and hold fast to both of them, for they are two ropes that will not break until the Day of Resurrection.” This piece of evidence is of very great importance. Its argumentative relationship is as follows: the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things ← the Book and the progeny; the Book and the progeny ← two ropes; the duty of the Muslim community ← “hold fast to both of them.” Thus, the very concepts that the first part brought together through lexicography and Qur’anic exegesis are united in this report as a coherent proposition.
Regarding the life and date of death of the Sayyid Muhammad Taliqani mentioned here, the publicly available general sources do not provide sufficiently ample and consistent information for a reliable biography. For this reason, this article refrains from constructing a conjectural biography and retains the identification given in ʿAbaqat—“the successor of Sayyid Ali Hamadani” and the author of Qiyafa-nama. This caution forms part of the article’s methodology for studying sources.
17. Badr al-Din Rumi: “An Unbreakable Rope” and Connection to Divine Good Pleasure
The author of ʿAbaqāt then quotes Badr al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad al-Rūmī in Tāj al-Durra, a commentary on the Burda ode, who, in explaining the verse “دعا إلى الله فالمتمسکون به / مستمسکون بحبل غیر منقصم” (“He called to God; those who hold fast to him / hold fast to a rope that cannot be severed”), identifies the Book of God and the Prophet’s progeny—described in ʿAbaqāt as “the people of infallibility and purity”—as a means connected to divine good pleasure, and invokes the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things in this very context (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, p. 65).
The value of this evidence lies in the juxtaposition of three concepts: “المتمسکون” (“those who hold fast”), “حبل غیر منقصم” (“a rope that cannot be severed”), and “the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things.” That is, when the commentator on the ode speaks of the unbreakable rope, he places the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things within the same context. Precise, reliable biographical information publicly available about this Badr al-Dīn Maḥmūd al-Rūmī is not as clear as that concerning al-Rāzī or Ibn Ḥajar; therefore, the final version of the article refrains from attributing unverified dates and works to him.
18. Al-Samhūdī: Placing the Interpretation of the Rope of God alongside the Transmission Routes of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things
Nūr al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Samhūdī (844–911 AH; 1440–1506 CE) was a scholar of hadith and jurisprudence and an important writer on the history of Medina. He is regarded as a descendant of al-Ḥasan and wrote numerous works on the history of Medina and hadith (TDV, entry “Semhûdî”). In Jawāhir al-ʿIqdayn, as quoted by the author of ʿAbaqāt, the interpretation of “واعتصموا بحبل الله” (“And hold fast to the rope of God”) and the statement “نحن حبل الله” (“We are the rope of God”) are discussed after the transmission routes of the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things are presented (ʿAbaqāt, digital edition, p. 61).
The mere proximity of two discussions in a single book does not, by itself, constitute conclusive proof that all their implications are identical; alongside more explicit evidence, however, it shows that linking the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things with the verse on holding fast also had precedents in the way a number of Sunni scholars organized their discussions. For Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn, this proximity provides further evidence that “holding fast to the Two Weighty Things” and “holding fast to the rope of God” have been read within a shared semantic field of guidance.
19. Aḥmad ʿUjaylī: The Most Explicit Statement of the Conclusion of the Fifth Argument
19–1. Introduction and Works
Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-Qādir al-ʿUjaylī al-Ḥifẓī al-Shāfiʿī was a man of letters, jurist, and author from the region of ʿAsīr and Yemen. Among his recognized works is Dhakhīrat al-Maʾāl fī Sharḥ ʿIqd Jawāhir al-Laʾāl fī Faḍāʾil al-Āl (The Treasure of the Ultimate Outcome: A Commentary on the Necklace of Pearly Jewels Concerning the Merits of the Prophet’s Family). Online biographical sources differ regarding the year of his death: some report 1203 AH, while others give a later date. Accordingly, instead of treating any one date as certain, this article notes the disagreement itself. What is more firmly established for the present discussion is the attribution of Dhakhīrat al-Maʾāl to him and the subject of the work, namely, the merits of the Prophet’s Family (see, for example, biographical entries/al-Ziriklī and bibliographical catalogues).
19–2. Bringing Together the Verse and the Hadith and Explicitly Defining the Scope of Holding Fast
Al-ʿUjaylī, as quoted in ʿAbaqāt, first cites the phrase “والزم بحبل الله ثم اعتصم” (“Cling to the rope of God, then hold fast”) and mentions the verse “واعتصموا بحبل الله جمیعاً ولا تفرقوا” (“And hold fast, all together, to the rope of God, and do not become divided”). He then cites the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things with the wording “ما إن تمسکتم بهما لن تضلوا بعدی” (“As long as you hold fast to them both, you will never go astray after me”). Finally, he states the conclusion in terms that effectively serve as the concluding textual evidence for the fifth argument:
“وَالْمُرَادُ وُجُوبُ الِاعْتِصَامِ بِأَقْوَالِهِمْ وَأَفْعَالِهِمْ وَأَحْوَالِهِمْ.” (“What is meant is the obligation to hold fast to their words, deeds, and states.”)
Dhakhīrat al-Maʾāl, as quoted in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār, digital edition, p. 65.
Translation: “What is intended is the obligation to hold fast to their sayings, deeds, and states.” Immediately after this statement, ʿAbaqāt begins the section entitled “The Sixth Argument.” This sentence can therefore be regarded as the most explicit summation of the textual evidence for the fifth argument. Here, the distance between “holding fast” and “following” is virtually eliminated: holding fast to the Ahl al-Bayt is interpreted as adherence to their “sayings, deeds, and states”—that is, an epistemic and practical concept, rather than mere love and respect.
20. Summary of Part Two
Part Two showed that, in the fifth argument, the “rope” is not merely a metaphor used to explain the term “holding fast.” In a body of reports cited by ʿAbaqāt, the Ahl al-Bayt, ʿAlī (peace be upon him), or the Prophet’s progeny are identified as referents of the “rope of God.” Some later works reproduce al-Thaʿlabī’s report; their value therefore lies more in demonstrating the circulation of this interpretation than in establishing a multiplicity of chains of transmission. By contrast, several pieces of evidence are more prominent in terms of the structure of the argument: the narration “تمسکوا بهذا هو حبل الله المتین” (“Hold fast to this; it is the firm rope of God”); the report “فتمسکوا بهما فإنهما حبلان لا ینقطعان” (“So hold fast to them both, for they are two ropes that do not break”); the poem attributed to al-Shāfiʿī, which presents allegiance to the Ahl al-Bayt as the “rope of God” and the Ahl al-Bayt themselves as the “ships of salvation,” linking this to the discussion of the saved sect; and, finally, al-ʿUjaylī’s statement extending holding fast to the sayings, deeds, and states of the Ahl al-Bayt.
By bringing these pieces of evidence together, the chain of reasoning in the fifth argument can be reconstructed as follows: “holding fast” in lexicography and exegesis = grasping firmly and adhering; “rope” = a means of protection from falling; the progeny in some exegetical works = the rope of God; the Book and the progeny in one report = two unbreakable ropes; the community’s duty = holding fast to them both; and, in al-ʿUjaylī’s final explicit statement, this holding fast = adherence to the sayings, deeds, and states of the Ahl al-Bayt. Thus, the fifth argument begins with a discussion of words but ultimately arrives at a conception of the progeny’s authority in providing guidance.
Final Conclusion
ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Dihlawī had stated that the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things “has no bearing” on the Shiʿi claim, because not everything to which one holds fast must possess supreme leadership. In its most precise formulation, the response offered by the fifth argument of ʿAbaqāt does not consist in rejecting an abstract proposition about every “object to which one holds fast”; rather, it demonstrates the characteristics of this particular object of adherence. In the wording under discussion, the progeny is the object of “holding fast,” and the outcome of holding fast to the Book and the progeny is identified as “not going astray.” The body of exegetical and lexical evidence assembled in ʿAbaqāt likewise explains holding fast in terms of “grasping firmly,” “adhering,” “seeking protection,” adherence to religion and obedience, and protection from falling.
Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s statement plays a central role here, for he both provides the explicit definition, “الاعتصام فی اللغة الاستمساك بالشیء” (“In linguistic usage, iʿtiṣām means holding firmly to something”), and, in interpreting ḥabl, develops the image of grasping a rope to escape a fall. This evidence establishes the first stage of the argument: iʿtiṣām is not a passive and merely emotional relationship, but a relationship involving guidance and practice.
The second stage is more significant. In numerous works cited in ʿAbaqāt, the Ahl al-Bayt or the ʿitrah are identified as “the rope of God.” The reiteration of this interpretation in Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī’s al-Ṣawāʿiq al-Muḥriqah—a work written in explicit polemical opposition to the Shiʿa—is noteworthy for purposes of argument, although it does not independently establish the soundness of the chain of transmission of al-Thaʿlabī’s report. More important are the reports that make the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things itself the basis for identifying the ʿitrah as the rope of God: “فتمسکوا بهما فإنهما حبلان لا ینقطعان” (“So hold fast to them both, for they are two ropes that do not break”). Here, the Book and the ʿitrah are two ropes, and the community’s obligation is to hold fast to both.
The poetry attributed to al-Shāfiʿī in Dhakhīrat al-Maʾāl likewise brings together “the rope of God,” “allegiance to the Ahl al-Bayt,” “the ark of salvation,” and “the saved sect” within a single system of imagery. This passage is important for understanding the fifth line of argument, because it transforms the “rope” from a lexical explanation into a criterion of salvation among religious paths. Finally, al-ʿAjīlī’s phrase—“وجوب الاعتصام بأقوالهم وأفعالهم وأحوالهم” (“the obligation to hold fast to their statements, actions, and states”)—is the most explicit practical formulation of the conclusion: holding fast to the Ahl al-Bayt means adhering to their words, deeds, and way of life.
Nevertheless, the limits of the conclusion must be observed. The fifth line of argument, taken alone, does not seek to establish every component of the Imami theory—such as identifying all the Imams by name or establishing all the legal and political dimensions of the imamate. Nor does the method of ʿAbaqāt rest upon a single line of argument; it places sixty-six lines of argument alongside one another. The specific conclusion of this line of argument is that the ʿitrah in the Hadith of the Two Weighty Things cannot be reduced to “an esteemed element lacking authority in matters of guidance.” In this line of argument, the ʿitrah is presented as that to which one must hold fast to avoid misguidance, as an instance of the rope to which one must cling, and, in the most explicit piece of evidence, as an authority whose statements, actions, and states must be adhered to. Accordingly, al-Dihlawī’s categorical claim that the hadith is unrelated to the Shiʿi contention does not account for all the evidence cited by the author of ʿAbaqāt unless it addresses this network of meanings.
Sources and References
A) Primary Source
Mīr Sayyid Ḥāmid Ḥusayn Mūsavī Nīshābūrī Hindī, “ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār fī Imāmat al-Aʾimma al-Aṭhār” (Fragrances of Light on the Imamate of the Pure Imams), vol. 20, edited and translated by Ghulāmriḍā Mawlānā Burūjirdī, Qom: Muʾassasat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmiyya, 1404 AH. The fifth argument in the digital edition used: pp. 53–65.
ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Dihlavī, “Tuḥfa-yi Ithnā ʿAshariyya” (The Twelver Gift); the statement discussed in this article is reported on the basis of Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn’s direct quotation in ʿAbaqāt al-Anwār; no independent copy of the Tuḥfa was consulted for comparison in this study.
B) Reference Sources for Biographical and Bibliographical Information
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “FAHREDDİN er-RÂZΔ (Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī). Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “MEFÂTÎHU’l-GAYB” (Keys to the Unseen). Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “İBN MANZÛR” (Ibn Manẓūr). Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “LİSÂNÜ’l-ARAB”. Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “İBN HACER el-HEYTEMΔ. Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “es-SAVÂİKU’l-MUHRİKA”. Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “ŞÂFİΔ. Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “el-ÜM”. Link
• TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, “SEMHÛDΔ. Link
• Usul.ai, “Yanābīʿ al-mawadda li-dhawī al-qurbā,” Sulaymān ibn Ibrāhīm al-Qundūzī. Link
• Biographical sources concerning Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-Qādir al-ʿUjaylī al-Ḥifẓī and “Dhakhīrat al-maʾāl,” taking into account the disagreement over his date of death. Link
C) Historical and Exegetical Works Cited in the Fifth Argument, as Quoted in ʿAbaqāt
Al-Ṭabarī, Tafsīr; al-Thaʿlabī, Tafsīr; al-Wāḥidī, Tafsīr; al-Baghawī, Maʿālim al-tanzīl; Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, al-Tafsīr al-kabīr/Mafātīḥ al-ghayb; al-Bayḍāwī, Anwār al-tanzīl; Niẓām al-Dīn al-Naysābūrī, Gharāʾib al-Qurʾān; al-Khāzin, Lubāb al-taʾwīl; Abū Ḥayyān, Tafsīr; Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī, Tafsīr al-Jalālayn and other works; Muḥammad al-Shirbīnī, al-Sirāj al-munīr; Ṣiddīq Ḥasan Khān, Fatḥ al-bayān; al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, al-Mufradāt; Ibn al-Athīr, al-Nihāya; Ibn Manẓūr, Lisān al-ʿArab; Muḥammad Ṭāhir al-Fattanī, Majmaʿ biḥār al-anwār; Murtaḍā al-Zabīdī, Tāj al-ʿarūs; al-Samhūdī, Jawāhir al-ʿiqdayn; Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī, al-Ṣawāʿiq al-muḥriqa; al-Shaykhānī al-Qādirī, al-Ṣirāṭ al-sawī; Muḥammad al-Badakhshānī, Miftāḥ al-najāt; Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī al-Ṣabbān, Isʿāf al-rāghibīn; Muḥammad Mubīn al-Lakhnawī, Wasīlat al-najāt; Walī Allāh al-Lakhnawī, Mirʾāt al-muʾminīn; Sulaymān al-Qundūzī, Yanābīʿ al-mawadda; Aḥmad al-ʿUjaylī, Dhakhīrat al-maʾāl; and other works quoted by Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn on pages 53–65 of the digital version of the Fifth Argument. In this article, except where explicitly stated otherwise, passages from these works have been presented on the basis of their quotation in ʿAbaqāt and have not been collated against all independently published editions.
Final Note on Accuracy in the Use of Sources
This final version has been prepared with the aim of providing “a research-oriented summary and an analysis of the argumentative structure of the Fifth Argument.” Accordingly, three levels have been distinguished: 1) Mīr Ḥāmid Ḥusayn’s own text and argument; 2) statements by Sunni scholars as quoted in ʿAbaqāt; 3) biographical and bibliographical information added from contemporary reference sources. Wherever the attribution of a poem, a date of death, or the precise identity of an author required independent investigation, the limitations of the sources have been explicitly stated rather than presenting the matter as certain.