{"id":2897,"date":"2025-04-20T17:17:32","date_gmt":"2025-04-20T13:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/?p=2897"},"modified":"2025-04-20T17:31:12","modified_gmt":"2025-04-20T14:01:12","slug":"tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/","title":{"rendered":"“Tashid al-Mata’in”: A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection"},"content":{"rendered":"

Shi’ism and Its Opponents: A Theological Analysis of the Theory of “Selection” and the Concept of Caliphate<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n

Abstract:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

This article explores the historical and theological disagreements surrounding the issue of Imamate and the succession of the Prophet of Islam. The main point of contention in the Muslim community after the Prophet\u2019s (peace be upon him and his family) passing revolved around the concept of caliphate and how the leader of the Muslim community should be chosen. Shi\u2019a Muslims believe in divinely appointed leadership and the immediate succession of Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him), while their opponents argue that the caliph should be selected by the people.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This fundamental disagreement led to the emergence of various intellectual and political movements throughout Islamic history. One of the most debated theories presented by Shi\u2019a opponents is the idea of \u201cforcd and dominance\u201d, which justifies the early caliphates as being established through force rather than public consent. In contrast, Shi\u2019a scholars have consistently challenged this view, particularly in theological texts, emphasizing the necessity of divinely ordained leadership and questioning the legitimacy of certain early caliphs as successors to the Prophet.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The article also reviews key theological works from both sides of the debate, including \u201cTuhfa Ithna Ashariyya\u201d by Abdul Aziz Dehlavi and the Shi\u2019a response found in \u201cAbaqat al-Anwar\u201d by Mir Hamid Husayn Hindi. These books represent scholarly dialogues between Shi\u2019a theologist and their opponents, focusing on the theological and historical foundations of Imamate and caliphate.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This research shows that although Shi\u2019a beliefs have been repeatedly challenged, these critiques have led Shi\u2019a scholars to offer strong and well-documented responses. As a result, Shi\u2019a theological literature has not only maintained its strength but has become more refined and precise. Moreover, such criticisms have pushed Shi\u2019a scholars to articulate their core beliefs with greater clarity.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In conclusion, the article highlights the enduring importance of these theological debates in Islamic history and shows how they continue to shape differing perspectives on leadership in the Muslim world today.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Explanation of the Article’s Illustration:<\/span><\/h5>\n

This conceptual image represents the two divergent paths in Islamic history, symbolizing the core disagreement over the issue of Imamate and Caliphate following the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and his family). One path illustrates the divine Imamate and the immediate Caliphate of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), which is based on explicit designation and divine appointment. The other path depicts the Caliphate based on public selection and the theory of force and dominance, a view upheld by opponents of Shi\u2019ism.<\/span><\/p>\n

The light at the center of the image symbolizes divine truth and guidance, casting its presence over this historical divergence and drawing seekers of truth toward exploring documented evidence and theological discussions. This image serves as a visual metaphor for the scholarly debates and intellectual disputes surrounding Imamate and Caliphate\u2014topics that this article aims to analyze.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the history of Islam, no disagreement has been as influential as the dispute over the Prophet\u2019s (peace be upon him and his family) succession and the issue of Imamate. This conflict is not only deeply rooted in the early history of the Muslim community, but due to its various dimensions, it also became the source of intellectual and social crises. It is a disagreement that still lingers at the heart of the Muslim world, having given rise to diverse religious and ideological movements.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Dispute over the Prophet\u2019s Succession: Divine Imamate or Popular Selection?<\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

The most significant disagreement in the Muslim community\u2014which continues to be discussed to this day\u2014was the issue of the Prophet\u2019s succession. This matter, which arose in the early days of Islam, became the foundation for later divisions and remained a central topic in theological and legal schools of thought.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Shi\u2019a Muslims, known as the followers of the school of Shi\u2019ism, believe that Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him) was the immediate and divinely appointed successor of the Prophet. In this view, leadership is not a matter of public choice but a divine appointment. The Imam, from a Shi\u2019a perspective, must be chosen by God, not elected by the people.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In contrast, opponents of the Shi\u2019a believe that leadership should be established through the selection of the people. According to them, anyone chosen by the people may become the Imam and the Prophet\u2019s successor. However, what is particularly striking is that\u2014contrary to the outward appearance of this theory\u2014none of the early Sunni caliphs actually came to power through a real process of public election, except for Imam Ali (peace be upon him), whose caliphate was indeed based on the genuine will and allegiance of the people during his time as the fourth caliph.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Force and Dominance: The Theory That Came to Dominate the Caliphate<\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

The theory of \u201cforce and dominance\u201d is one of the key ideas presented by opponents of Shi\u2019ism. According to this view, anyone who manages to seize power\u2014by any means, even through force, coup, or bloodshed\u2014can be considered the legitimate caliph and successor of the Prophet. This perspective openly declares that what truly matters is strength and control, not the people\u2019s choice.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This theory later gave rise to other ideas, such as the belief in the prohibition of rising against a ruler. According to this belief, even if the ruler is unjust, it is religiously and theologicaly forbidden to oppose him. Some traditions even suggest that if the ruler has the heart of a devil, resisting him is still not allowed.<\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n
Saqifah: The Starting Point of the Caliphate Dispute<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

After the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him and his family) passed away, the first caliph was appointed at <\/span><\/span>\u201c<\/span><\/span>Saqifah Bani Sa’idah<\/span><\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/span> with the pledge of allegiance from just one person. Yet, in the discourse of the Shi\u2019a opponents, this event is referred to as a \u201cconsensus,\u201d even though in practice, only one person initiated and secured the decision. Interestingly, in this mindset, even a single person’s pledge is sometimes counted as a communal consensus!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

These contradictions reveal that behind the so-called \u201ctheory of public choice\u201d lies nothing but the reality of dominance and force. In practice, the one with more power and military strength becomes the caliph, regardless of true public approval.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Books and Debates: Scholarly Engagement Between the Shi\u2018a and Their Opponents<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

A Clash of Ideas: Theological Debates Between Shi\u2018a and Opposing Schools Throughout Islamic History<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Origins of Dispute in the Muslim Community<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

The most significant and impactful disagreement in the history of the Muslim community revolves around the issue of succession and leadership after the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him and his family). This division became the root cause of many subsequent conflicts in Islamic history and led to the formation of two major ideological paths. One group, the Shi\u2018a, believes that leadership (Imamate) is divinely appointed, while the other groups believe that the caliph should be chosen by the people.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Shi\u2018a and Their Distinct Perspective on Imamate<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

Shi\u2018a Muslims believe that Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him) was the immediate and divinely appointed successor of the Prophet. From their perspective, Imamate is a matter of divine designation and goes beyond popular vote or communal consensus. On the other hand, their opponents claim that leadership must be established through the people\u2019s choice. However, in practice, many of the caliphs who ruled after the Prophet gained power not through a public election, but rather through force and dominance.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Theory of Force and Domination: The Hidden Reality Behind Popular Choice<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

One of the central doctrines among Shi\u2018a opponents is the theory of \u201cforce and domination\u201d, which holds that anyone who can seize power\u2014through violence, military force, or political manipulation\u2014can be recognized as a legitimate caliph. In this view, public consensus is often used as a fa\u00e7ade to cover the reality of force and domination.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Formation of Two Main Currents in Islam<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

After the passing of the Prophet, this dispute quickly manifested in the political sphere. One group firmly adhered to the Qur’an and the Prophet’s traditions, insisting that leadership must be designated by God. The other group rejected this notion and emphasized public selection as the basis of the caliphate.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Theological Writings and Scholarly Debates Between Shi\u2018a and Their Opponents<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

Both Shi\u2018a scholars and their opponents composed numerous theological texts to support their beliefs and respond to criticisms. Over time, a rich tradition of scholarly debate developed, especially in the form of systematic theological responses by Shi\u2018a scholars, continuing well into the 19th century CE.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

In the 19th century CE, during a time when Shi\u2018ism was expanding in India and some local rulers leaned toward Shi\u2018a beliefs, “Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi” published a book titled \u201cTuhfa Ithna Ashariyya\u201d (Meaning A Gift to the Shiites). This work offered a harsh critique of Shi\u2018a doctrines, especially the concept of Imamate and the succession of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), structured across twelve chapters.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Methodology of Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya and Its Parallels With “Minhaj al-Sunnah”<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

The argumentative style and methodology of Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya bear strong resemblance to that of “Minhaj al-Sunnah” by Ibn Taymiyyah. Both books are known for spreading baseless and ethically questionable arguments under the guise of scholarly criticism. These works represent a polemical approach aimed at discrediting Shi\u2018a beliefs rather than engaging in fair discourse.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Shi\u2018a Documentary Response: The Authoritative Work \u2018Abaqat al-Anwar<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

In response, prominent Shi\u2018a scholar Sayyid Mir Hamid Husayn Hindi wrote “Abaqat al-Anwar”, a meticulously researched and well-argued refutation of the seventh chapter of Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya. This monumental work was so comprehensive and methodical that none of the Shi\u2018a critics\u2019 opponents could effectively counter it. \u2018Abaqat al-Anwar remains a cornerstone in Shi\u2018a apologetics and theological defense.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of \u2018Abaqat al-Anwar<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

“Abaqat al-Anwar” is regarded as one of the most authoritative texts in Shi\u2018a theological literature. Due to its strong reasoning and extensive use of sources, it has stood the test of time and continues to serve as a key reference in defending Shi\u2018a doctrines and critically evaluating opposing beliefs.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Critique of the Tenth Chapter of \u201cTuhfa Ithna Ashariyya\u201d and the Shi\u2018a Scholarly Response<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n

The tenth chapter of Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya is one of the most significant parts of the book, where Abdul Aziz Dehlawi addresses the Shi\u2018a criticisms regarding the first three caliphs. In this chapter, he attempts to refute the points raised by the Shi\u2018a about the caliphs and their legitimacy, claiming that they are not usurpers of the caliphate.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In Shi\u2018a theological works, there is often a section dedicated to critiquing the caliphs and examining their qualifications for the caliphate. Shi\u2018a scholars argue that several of the early caliphs were unqualified to succeed Prophet Muhammad. This critique has remained one of the central topics in Shi\u2018a theological texts Which is known as the “Muta’in”.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In response to Dehlawi’s criticisms, Father of Mirhamed Hossein Hendiwrote a book entitled “Tashid al-Mata\u2018in”. The term “Tashid” means “strengthening” or “reinforcing,” especially in the context of solid structures like towers, as referenced in the Quran. In this book, the author not only rejects Dehlawi\u2019s critiques but also affirms and strengthens the Shi\u2018a criticisms against the caliphs, presenting them as more substantiated and firmly rooted in historical and theological evidence.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The purpose of Tashid al-Mata\u2018in was to affirm the correctness of the Shi\u2018a criticisms against the usurping caliphs. The author argues that the points raised by the Shi\u2018a regarding the caliphs are entirely valid and well-supported by sound arguments, demonstrating the unfitness of these rulers for the caliphate.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This book is especially significant due to its well-documented and well-reasoned responses to the issues raised in Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya. the author Using credible sources and strong arguments to provides a scholarly defense of Shi\u2018a beliefs and gives a thorough rebuttal to Dehlawi\u2019s critiques.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a> “Tashid al-Mata\u2018in” is regarded as a major scholarly work in the history of Shi\u2018a theology. The book highlights that the Shi\u2018a criticisms of the usurping caliphs are not baseless, but are instead backed by valid and credible evidence questioning the legitimacy of these rulers.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In conclusion, a comparative examination of Tuhfa Ithna Ashariyya and Shi\u2018a responses in works like Tashid al-Mata\u2018in demonstrates the depth and precision of Shi\u2018a theological debates. While Dehlawi attempts to reject the Shi\u2018a critiques of the first caliphs, Shi\u2018a authors strengthen and substantiate these critiques by drawing on reputable sources and scholarly reasoning. As such, Tashid al-Mata\u2018in not only serves as an academic rebuttal to Dehlawi\u2019s criticism but also affirms the validity and robustness of Shi\u2018a beliefs regarding the caliphate and imamate. This ongoing intellectual and religious dialogue, which continues from the early centuries of Islam, highlights the vibrancy and depth of Shi\u2018a theological thought in confronting opposing ideologies.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u0645\u062a\u0646 \u0645\u0642\u0627\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0635\u0648\u0631\u062a \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0633\u06cc<\/a><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Shi’ism and Its Opponents: A Theological Analysis of the Theory of “Selection” and the Concept of Caliphate Abstract: This article explores the historical and theological disagreements surrounding the issue of Imamate and the succession of the Prophet of Islam. The main point of contention in the Muslim community after the Prophet\u2019s (peace be upon him […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":2649,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[755,901,1060],"tags":[811,905,904],"class_list":["post-2897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-imamat","category-tasheed-al-mataen","category-wahhabism","tag-naba_al_azim","tag-naba-ol-azim","tag-nabaolazim"],"yoast_head":"\n"Tashid al-Mata'in": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection - \u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""Tashid al-Mata'in": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Shi’ism and Its Opponents: A Theological Analysis of the Theory of “Selection” and the Concept of Caliphate Abstract: This article explores the historical and theological disagreements surrounding the issue of Imamate and the succession of the Prophet of Islam. The main point of contention in the Muslim community after the Prophet\u2019s (peace be upon him […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1792\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"nabaolazim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"nabaolazim\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"nabaolazim\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16\"},\"headline\":\"“Tashid al-Mata’in”: A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\"},\"wordCount\":2218,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Naba_Al_Azim\",\"Naba-ol-Azim\",\"NabaolAzim\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Imamat\",\"Tasheed al-Mata'en\",\"Wahhabism\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\",\"name\":\"\\\"Tashid al-Mata'in\\\": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection - \u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp\",\"width\":1792,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u062e\u0627\u0646\u0647\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“Tashid al-Mata’in”: A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/\",\"name\":\"\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645\",\"description\":\"\u0645\u062d\u0641\u0644\u06cc \u0628\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u067e\u0698\u0648\u0647\u0634 \u0647\u0627\u06cc \u0634\u06cc\u0639\u0647\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16\",\"name\":\"nabaolazim\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13adf2716efc9d994bc195241284f660d5deb3cdc32e30459a2ff5c7d78b3ff0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13adf2716efc9d994bc195241284f660d5deb3cdc32e30459a2ff5c7d78b3ff0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"nabaolazim\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/author\/nabaolazim\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Tashid al-Mata'in\": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection - \u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Tashid al-Mata'in\": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection","og_description":"Shi’ism and Its Opponents: A Theological Analysis of the Theory of “Selection” and the Concept of Caliphate Abstract: This article explores the historical and theological disagreements surrounding the issue of Imamate and the succession of the Prophet of Islam. The main point of contention in the Muslim community after the Prophet\u2019s (peace be upon him […]","og_url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/","og_site_name":"\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645","article_published_time":"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1792,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"nabaolazim","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"nabaolazim","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/"},"author":{"name":"nabaolazim","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16"},"headline":"“Tashid al-Mata’in”: A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection","datePublished":"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/"},"wordCount":2218,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp","keywords":["Naba_Al_Azim","Naba-ol-Azim","NabaolAzim"],"articleSection":["Imamat","Tasheed al-Mata'en","Wahhabism"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/","url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/","name":"\"Tashid al-Mata'in\": A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection - \u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-20T13:47:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-20T14:01:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/\u062a\u0634\u06cc\u06cc\u062f-\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0627\u0639\u0646-\u06cc\u06a9.webp","width":1792,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/2025\/04\/tashid-al-matain-a-scholarly-analysis-refuting-the-legitimacy-of-the-early-caliphs-1-a-critique-of-the-theory-of-selection\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u062e\u0627\u0646\u0647","item":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“Tashid al-Mata’in”: A Scholarly Analysis Refuting the Legitimacy of the Early Caliphs (1) \u2014 A Critique of the Theory of Selection"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/","name":"\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u06cc\u0645","description":"\u0645\u062d\u0641\u0644\u06cc \u0628\u0631\u0627\u06cc \u067e\u0698\u0648\u0647\u0634 \u0647\u0627\u06cc \u0634\u06cc\u0639\u0647","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/360994c5ad715ae2e27ca1afdf0c4a16","name":"nabaolazim","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13adf2716efc9d994bc195241284f660d5deb3cdc32e30459a2ff5c7d78b3ff0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13adf2716efc9d994bc195241284f660d5deb3cdc32e30459a2ff5c7d78b3ff0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"nabaolazim"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/"},"url":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/author\/nabaolazim\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2897"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2918,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2897\/revisions\/2918"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nabaolazim.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}